- From: Eric Jain <Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:16:10 +0200
- To: Matthias Samwald <samwald@gmx.at>
- CC: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Matthias Samwald wrote: > I would actually prefer the "commons/source/id.type" pattern, if it can > be implemented with the current purl.org system. It is more intuitive to > most developers/users and it brings the elements of the URI into a nice > hierarchical order. id.type certainly seems like a good idea for the actual URL of a specific representation, as anything else doesn't "Save as..." well (except perhaps web pages, where browsers are smart enough to propose the .html extension).
Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2007 07:16:24 UTC