W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > August 2007

Re: Does follow-your-nose apply in the enterprise? was: RDF for molecules, using InChI

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 00:03:13 +0100
Message-Id: <00A44BA2-0BAC-4C64-A58B-F6AD62914C12@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: public-semweb-lifesci hcls <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>

On Aug 22, 2007, at 2:50 AM, Jonathan Rees wrote:

> Sure - to list alternatives with costs and benefits is just what  
> I've proposed to do in order to civilize these debates, and as a  
> waypoint toward drafting the fabled 'recommendations' report. I'm  
> sorry I've been inactive on the list but other matters have been  
> pressing. I have been trying to keep up and have not forgotten  
> about the project. I'll plan to report at the BioRDF call on Sept  
> 17, if not sooner. But you don't need to wait for me; I welcome  
> additions to the recommendations area of the wiki, starting at  
> http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Tasks/ 
> URI_Best_Practices/Recommendations . E.g. David Booth should feel  
> free to link his declarations memo (which echoes some of my own  
> angst) from the 'reference' list or this 'analysis and ideas' list.

Following Matthias's suggestion, I started adding them to this page:
(At the bottom under issues.)

Would you prefer they migrated to the recommendations page (which is  
where, IIRC, Alan suggested they go)?

Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:03:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:52:33 UTC