- From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:21:33 -0400
- To: "Michel_Dumontier" <Michel_Dumontier@carleton.ca>, <wangxiao@musc.edu>, <ogbujic@ccf.org>
- Cc: "public-semweb-lifesci hcls" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
> From: Michel_Dumontier > [ . . . ] > In complete contrast to both of these is the case where a user > like me, has no intent to publish any documents on the web, but > requires a stable identifier to make statements about things. > Sure, HTTP URIs can be used as identifiers, but why would I > mint arbitrary HTTP URIs when I can use a scheme that has no > resolution protocol implicitly or explicitly associated with > it? Indeed, in this case there would be no benefit to using HTTP URIs. But the situation you describe is also not a practice that we should be recommending, because it inhibits the use of those URIs by others. We should be recommending practices that *encourage* people to use URIs that can be readily used by others. That's kind of the whole point of working together as a community. David Booth, Ph.D. HP Software +1 617 629 8881 office | dbooth@hp.com http://www.hp.com/go/software Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not represent the official views of HP unless explicitly stated otherwise.
Received on Wednesday, 8 August 2007 17:23:03 UTC