W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > April 2007

Re: Wiki page for HCLSIG feedback on OWL 1.1 updated

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 22:34:21 -0400
Message-Id: <A54B578A-1673-485F-8BC4-4E292DF00C98@gmail.com>
Cc: <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
To: "Kashyap, Vipul" <VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG>
On Apr 5, 2007, at 5:26 PM, Kashyap, Vipul wrote:
> I have updated the Wiki page at: http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG/OWL1.1
> Specifically, I have expressed dissent for the punning feature of  
> OWL1.1 and presented some counterarguments.
> Look forward to feedback.
Hi Vipul,

While I have the intuitive sense that your first comment could be  
true, it would be useful if you could supply an example where it  
might happen.

Regarding your second comment, about "curator" possibly having  
different semantics when applied to a class versus an instance, it  
would be helpful to give a plausible example of two such different  

Received on Friday, 6 April 2007 04:38:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:52:30 UTC