W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > September 2006

Re: BioRDF: URL Statements

From: Susie Stephens <susie.stephens@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:39:38 -0400
Message-ID: <451D929A.4040804@oracle.com>
To: Xiaoshu Wang <wangxiao@musc.edu>
CC: "'public-semweb-lifesci'" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>

Xiaoshu,

The idea behind the short URI statements is to get some input as to what 
people's thoughts are regarding URIs. The short statements are therefore 
just a tool for helping us to generate a document. They will not form 
part of a URI.

The short statements are being collecting on the BioRDF wiki:
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Tasks/URI_Best_Practices/URI_Statements

Kind regards,

Susie



Xiaoshu Wang wrote:
> --Susie,
>
>   
>> John Barkley has proposed the following examples of short statement:
>> 1. Identify MIME Types of URIs.
>> 2. Identify versions of URIs
>> 3. URIs should dereference to something, even if it is only 
>> documentation,e.g., rdfs:comment 4. Use LSIDs
>>     
>
> I might missed a bit of background, but I am not sure where the "short
> statement" is going to be put?  For example, a resource with a uri of xURI.
> How the short statement is fetched? By derefencing xURI or ...? 
>
> If it is by dereferencing the xURI, then I have a few questions:
> 1. MIME type will be known when the resource is dereferenced, why is it need
> to be pre-known?
> 2. Does a URI has version? Or it is resource that has version? I am not sure
> what does "Identify versions of URIs" mean?
> 4. seems to be contradicted to what the TAG's finding[1]. Is there any
> compelling reasons to use LSID over httpURI?
>
> [1]. http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/URNsAndRegistries-50.xml
>
> Cheers,
>
> Xiaoshu
>
>
>   
Received on Friday, 29 September 2006 21:40:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:16:36 GMT