RE: Playing with sets in OWL...

Marco,

> Another problem is that the set could have properties on its own, for
> instance:
> 
> Set1 hasAuthor Jhon
> 
> meaning that John is defining it. But hasAuthor is typically 
> used for individuals, and I wouldn't like to fall in 
> OWL-Full, by making an OWL reasoner to interpret Set1 both as 
> an individual and a class.

Cann't you restrict your hasAuthor property to Jhon with owl:hasValue?

Xiaoshu