W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > October 2006

Re: modelling controlled vocabularies [was: Re: CANCELLED Oct 26 Teleconference Agenda]

From: Eric Neumann <ENEUMANN@TERANODE.COM>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:45:33 -0500
Message-ID: <BBE3ECB4-BAB2-4110-A7AD-8C32C58C0CF7@TERANODE.COM>
cc: "W3C HCLSIG" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
To: "Ralph R.Swick" <swick@w3.org>

Thanks Ralph,

This is a useful reference for some of our activities!

Eric


> From: Ralph R. Swick <swick@w3.org>
> Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:43:32 -0400
> Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20061026114215.04dd2d10@127.0.0.1>
> To: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@bio.ri.ccf.org>
> Cc: W3C HCLSIG <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
> At 11:26 AM 10/26/2006 -0400, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:
> >I'm not 100% certain the action item is related to this, but  
> during the F2F I had asked the Interest Group for opinions on the  
> various ways of modelling 'controlled values' for a property:
>
> There is some material relevant to this question in:
>
> Representing Specified Values in OWL: "value partitions" and "value  
> sets"
> W3C Working Group Note 17 May 2005
> http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-specified-values



Eric Neumann, PhD
co-chair, W3C Healthcare and Life Sciences,
and Senior Director Product Strategy
Teranode Corporation
411 1st Avenue South, Suite 700
Seattle, WA 98104
+1 (781)856-9132
www.teranode.com
Received on Tuesday, 31 October 2006 13:52:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:00:45 GMT