W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > October 2006

Re: OWL vs RDF

From: Robert Stevens <robert.stevens@manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 20:03:47 +0100
Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.2.20061027195947.03b358c0@manchester.ac.uk>
To: William Bug <William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>, Phillip Lord <phillip.lord@newcastle.ac.uk>
Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
the Protege OWL tutorial will be updated "real soon now". We'll be 
doing OWL 1..1 (there wasn't any point updating before 1.1), but also 
including stuff about data type properties (which can now be reasoned 
over well) and some stuff about instances. finally, there's a whole 
lot of  Protege stuff to change....

I wouldn't, however, hold your breath. Perhaps it will be 
ready  early next year.

robert.At 18:45 27/10/2006, William Bug wrote:
>This is a very important point.  Thanks, Phil.
>
>As is spelled out in the wonderful ProtegeOWL Tutorial PDF (which 
>would be wonderful to have updated a bit), leaning on the reasoner 
>during early phases of ontology construction is very helpful, but 
>ultimately once you have more "hardened" components, you can "save" 
>the inferred graph and distribute that for the user community.
>
>Cheers,
>Bill
>
>On Oct 27, 2006, at 3:54 AM, Phillip Lord wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>"Robert" == Robert Stevens 
>>>>>>><<mailto:robert.stevens@manchester.ac.uk>robert.stevens@manchester.ac.uk> 
>>>>>>>writes:
>>
>>   Robert> There's another answer of using the reasoner by building
>>   Robert> your ontology to take advantage of its capabilities. the
>>   Robert> conceptual lego approach relies on the reasoner.
>>
>>
>>
>>Incidentally, Robert's point reminded me of another thing you can do
>>without a reasoner.
>>
>>You can use your reasoner to build your ontology, and then deploy it
>>without. One of the main reasons that people don't like DL reasoners s
>>the overhead that they add to architectures. I think that this is a
>>reasonable point but, in general, only at deployment time. When
>>building your ontology, it's not that much hassle to have a
>>reasoner -- my experience suggests it saves your more time than it
>>costs you.
>>
>>Phil
>
>Bill Bug
>Senior Research Analyst/Ontological Engineer
>
>Laboratory for Bioimaging  & Anatomical Informatics
>www.neuroterrain.org
>Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy
>Drexel University College of Medicine
>2900 Queen Lane
>Philadelphia, PA    19129
>215 991 8430 (ph)
>610 457 0443 (mobile)
>215 843 9367 (fax)
>
>
>Please Note: I now have a new email - 
><mailto:William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 27 October 2006 19:04:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:00:45 GMT