Seaborne, Andy wrote: > - It appears that ex9 has no answers on the 10e6 triple 7.0a UniProt > extract Perhaps "2.7.7.-" and "3.1.3.16" should be replaced with more general enzyme categories, e.g. "2.-.-.-" (all transferases) and "3.-.-.-" (all hydrolases). > - Similarly, none of the queries have any results on the 1e6 triple 7.0a > extract if I have prepared the data correctly. The 1M set is indeed not particularly useful for querying. It should be possible to extract a set of 1M statements from the 100M set that gives matches for all of the test queries, but I don't see a simple way to accomplish this.Received on Thursday, 9 March 2006 18:11:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:16:32 GMT