Re: Semantic content negotiation (was Re: expectations of vocabulary)

Oops, I was a couple of posts out in the first link, should be a
little less baffling with this one:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-semweb-lifesci/2006Jul/0139.html

(thanks Henry!)

On 7/24/06, Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com> wrote:
> Seems to be a little thread convergence going on. Gmail doesn't seem
> to allow in-reply-to on two posts, so instead:
>
> Re: BioRDF: URI Best Practices
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-semweb-lifesci/2006Jul/0141.html
>
> Re: expectations of vocabulary
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2006Jul/0068.html
>
> [I've at least one ulterior motive in wanting to see this discussion
> evolve further. When I get time I want to play with the idea of
> "semantic cookies" - put the URI of the agent-user's FOAF profile in a
> Link: header, server adjusts response appropriately]
>
> Cheers,
> Danny.
>
> --
>
> http://dannyayers.com
>


-- 

http://dannyayers.com

Received on Monday, 24 July 2006 09:40:03 UTC