W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > July 2006

Re: XML vs. RDF

From: Glen Newton - NRC/CNRC CISTI/ICIST Research <glen.newton@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 10:59:41 -0400
Message-ID: <17595.42461.773805.390787@orca.cisti.nrc.ca>
To: <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>


Some articles from researchers who appear to not like RDF and the
direction the Semantic Web is headed (for balance):

"The Pragmatic Web: A Manifesto"
Mareike Schoop,Aldo de Moor, Jan L.G. Dietz
http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1125944.1125979
Communications of the ACM  archive
2006, Volume 49 ,  Issue 5  (May 2006) Pages: 75 - 76  

Rethinking the semantic Web. Part I
McCool, R.  
Internet Computing, IEEE Nov.-Dec. 2005
Volume: 9,  Issue: 6, p. 86- 87
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?isnumber=32927&arnumber=1541954&count=11&index=10

Rethinking the semantic Web. Part 2
McCooI, R.  
Internet Computing, IEEE Jan.-Feb. 2006
Volume: 10,  Issue: 1, 93- 96
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?isnumber=33376&arnumber=1580420&count=18&index=16

-Glen Newton

-- 

Glen Newton | glen.newton@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca
Group Leader (Acting), CISTI Research
Chef de groupe (par intérim), Recherche de l'ICIST
tel/tél: 613-990-9163 | facsimile/télécopieur 613-952-8246
Canada Institute for Scientific and Technical Information (CISTI)
National Research Council Canada (NRC)| M-55, 1200 Montreal Road
http://www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/
Institut canadien de l'information scientifique et technique (ICIST) 
Conseil national de recherches Canada | M-55, 1200 chemin Montréal
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R6  
Government of Canada | Gouvernement du Canada   
--


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Barkley" <jbarkley@nist.gov>
Sender: public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org
To: <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Cc: <jbarkley@nist.gov>
Subject: Re: XML vs. RDF
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 07:52:43 -0400

On the BIONT call last Tuesday (July 11), we discussed some of the points
that Bill made in his email on XML vs. RDF. Based on a suggestion by Alan to
dig deeper into this question, we discussed the idea of using short examples
to illustrate the technical differences between XML vs. RDF.

For my colleagues, I created a simple example that I thought I would share
(attached) illustrating the difference between XML and RDF with respect to
the automated validation of semantic consistency.

jb


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kashyap, Vipul" <VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG>
To: "w3c semweb hcls" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 7:11 PM
Subject: [BIONT] Teleconference (Date correction) Tomorrow, Tuesday 11th
July, 2006




Phone: +1 617 761 6200, conference 24668 ("BIONT")



IRC: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/hcls



Browser-based IRC client: http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc



Date and Time: 11th July, 2006, 11:00am - 12:00pm



Agenda:



-        Discuss progress on Ontology Task Force tasks

-        Any other discussion





=======================================

Vipul Kashyap, Ph.D.

Senior Medical Informatician

Clinical Informatics R&D, Partners HealthCare System

Phone: (781)416-9254

Cell: (617)943-7120

http://www.partners.org/cird/AboutUs.asp?cBox=Staff&stAb=vik



To keep up you need the right answers; to get ahead you need the right
questions

---John Browning and Spencer Reiss, Wired 6.04.95
Received on Monday, 17 July 2006 14:49:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:00:44 GMT