W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > July 2006

Re: LSIDs and ontology segmentation

From: Benjamin H Szekely <bhszekel@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 13:35:11 -0400
To: markw@illuminae.com
Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org, public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFF52FACB3.1AC89E08-ON852571AA.00603925-852571AA.00609AC1@us.ibm.com>
Hi All,
    What Mark points out, quoted below, is absolutely correct.  In the 
NCBI prototype ontologies, every OWL Class and Property has its own LSID 
and resolves to the small amount of RDF that encapsulates it.  As an 
example, resolve the LSID for the OMIM ontology

urn:lsid:ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.lsid.biopathways.org:ontologies:MIM

in Firefox Launchpad via: 
lsidres:urn:lsid:ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.lsid.biopathways.org:ontologies:MIM. One 
can navigate the entire ontology by surfing the LSID metadata associated 
with each ontology node. 


> Here is where I think the LSID could really shine!  Unlike a URL, the
> LSID does not have to return an entire document in response to a
> getMetaData call.  Thus, if an LSID were used as the identifier for an
> ontology node, the behaviour of the getMetadata call could be, by
> convention or by standard, to return only the relevant ontology
> fragment, where that fragment was generated by e.g. the Rector
> Segmentation generator in the background.

Ben Szekely
IBM Software Engineer
Advanced Internet Technology, Cambridge, MA
bhszekel@us.ibm.com
Received on Thursday, 13 July 2006 17:35:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:00:44 GMT