W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > February 2006


From: John Madden <john.madden@duke.edu>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:27:07 -0500
Message-Id: <40893D7A-6AFD-42E1-B2B6-5ED85BBC35C9@duke.edu>
To: HCLS HCLS <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>

> GRDDL and RDF/A thus complement each other.  An XHTML2
> document could declare the GRDDL profile and be recognized
> by a GRDDL-aware processor with built-in recognition of the
> RDF/A transformation URI or could use a generic GRDDL
> processor that  actually dereferences the RDF/A transformation URI.
> So, an RDF/A transform is but one of the many transforms that
> would be available to a GRDDL processor.

I really like this way of thinking.

It preserves all the flexibility of GRDDL when flexibility is needed,  
but offers a default implementation approach that is easily  
understood and hits the 80/20 point.
Received on Friday, 17 February 2006 23:27:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:52:25 UTC