W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > August 2006

RE: [BIONT] Teleconference 22nd August, 2006 - All times are US Eastern!

From: Kashyap, Vipul <VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:53:14 -0400
Message-ID: <2BF18EC866AF0448816CDB62ADF6538104C15EB7@PHSXMB11.partners.org>
To: "William Bug" <William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>
Cc: <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>


The wiki URL was on the agenda page.





From: William Bug [mailto:William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 8:28 AM
To: Kashyap, Vipul
Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject: Re: [BIONT] Teleconference 22nd August, 2006 - All times are US


Hi Vipul,


I've finally filled out my agenda item a bit.  Unfortunately, I had a very
difficult time trying to figure out where the relevant prior work was on the
Wiki.  I think I found the important Use Cases - Don & Kei's work on the
NeuronDB to CocoDat connection along with the Parkinson's Use Case and the page
on GeneNetwork.


I'm also posting four papers for review which I believe can really help to
germinate specific, focussed ideas on how to home our Use Cases.


Another thing I did do - I've been having a lot of difficulty keeping track of
who's who on the list and what projects they've been working on - I redid a bit
of the main HCLSIG Wiki page, added a full participant's list, and linked it to
their "Intro" posting from last winter.  Unfortunately - and I'm still a bit
confused on this point - I wasn't certain which was the "official" base Wiki
page - http://esw.w3.org/topic/SemanticWebForLifeSciences or
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG, so I put the link to the new list of
participants in both places.


This may seem like a duplication of existing effort, but the big differences
between this new list and the old list of "Intros" are:

          1) people's affiliations & projects (along with external links) are
now all in one table on one page);

          2) Each individual is represented with an compliant WikiName, which
links to the standard WikiName personal page at the Wiki root.  Now, when
anyone's name appears using this WikiName anywhere in the HCLSIG Wiki, it will
automagically link to their personal Wiki page - which links out to their
"Intro", as well.  Though I'm not particularly enamored of the CamelCase
WikiName style, when in Rome....  This is a major convenience  that can make it
much easier for all of us to stay clear about who is working on various aspects
of the HCLSIG tasks and help us all to keep better in touch with our colleagues.


I'd strongly encourage everyone to review these pages - the main participant
list and their new personal W3C SW HCLSIG Wiki page - to make certain:

          - it represents info the way they want it presented.  In particular,
individuals roles and titles are included ad hoc, based on whether they were
explicitly stated in their intro.  The same is true for affiliations and listed
projects.  No one should take what is represented here as anything more than my
best attempt to liberate as much info as I could from those original emails -
with a little additional poking about the web - that might be of use to us all.
I only had so much time available to do this and didn't want to leave anyone off
the list.

          - there are no typos people care about

          - if you find yourself editing a page on the Wiki, try to use the
WikiName style.  The name will then automagically link to that person's HCLSIG
WIki personal contact page.  Feel free to change existing names you find on the
web pages to meet this standard as well.


Talk to you all a little later.






On Aug 21, 2006, at 7:08 PM, Kashyap, Vipul wrote:




Phone: +1 617 761 6200, conference 24668 ("BIONT")

IRC: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/hcls

Browser-based IRC client: http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc

Date and Time: 22nd August, 11:00am - 12:00pm[VK]  Eastern (US_


Agenda (Tentative, See http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/OntologyTaskForce/Telcons )


Discuss refined use case: Lead by Bill Bug

Discuss tasks for discussion at F2F in Amsterdam. Some examples are:

1. OWL vs RDF (John Barkley?)

2. Ontology Mapping (Kei-Chung?[VK] , Donald Doherty?)

3. Realization of Use Case, identifying BioRDF repositories, joint discussion

with BioRDF group (Vipul Kashyap?)


Use case is available at: http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/ParkinsonUseCase 



Bill Bug

Senior Research Analyst/Ontological Engineer


Laboratory for Bioimaging  & Anatomical Informatics


Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy

Drexel University College of Medicine

2900 Queen Lane

Philadelphia, PA    19129

215 991 8430 (ph)

610 457 0443 (mobile)

215 843 9367 (fax)



Please Note: I now have a new email - William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu




This email and any accompanying attachments are confidential. 
This information is intended solely for the use of the individual 
to whom it is addressed. Any review, disclosure, copying, 
distribution, or use of this email communication by others is strictly 
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us 
immediately by returning this message to the sender and delete 
all copies. Thank you for your cooperation.
Received on Tuesday, 22 August 2006 12:53:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:52:27 UTC