Re: [presentation-api] [meta] CfC to publish a new Working Draft

@anssiko I will provide text for the Status of This Document section.

With the risk of delaying the publication a bit... Re-reading the spec
 and the list of open issues, if we want to use the publication to 
encourage a "wide review" of the spec, wouldn't it make sense to make 
a small push to fix the "known bugs", by which I mean the parts where 
we know that the spec is wrong or incomplete and that should only 
require a Pull Request?

I'm thinking about the following issues in particular:

#165 conflict description for uniquely identifying a presentation 
session
#193 Define a "set of presentations" for the receiving context?
#211 binaryType attribute's default value and get/set behaviour needs 
to be specified
#229 Need algorithm for establishing a presentation connection when 
the previous connection(s) were closed
#245 "Known connection" in reconnect() may be linked to another 
browsing context

That seems doable in a reasonable amount of time, and that would only 
leave open issues about informative guidelines, possible enhancements,
 meta-issues and a couple of more long-lasting discussions. I'm 
willing to take a stab at most of the issues listed above next week, 
at least.


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tidoust
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/presentation-api/issues/244#issuecomment-176843851
 using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 29 January 2016 16:22:32 UTC