- From: Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 13:19:52 +0000
- To: public-secondscreen@w3.org
It seems no concerns raised with the general direction proposed by @schien. It also appears we've not yet settled on the interface naming. We should first update the Conformance section using the [@tidoust's proposal][1] as a starting point and bake in the changes to the normative parts when consensus emerges on naming. All - please let us know your preference and/or suggestions with respect to naming. @mfoltzgoogle Feel free to update the Conformance section with a note stating that the rest of the spec have not yet been reworked to match the conformance classes split. [1]: https://github.com/w3c/presentation-api/issues/93 -- GitHub Notif of comment by anssiko See https://github.com/w3c/presentation-api/issues/91#issuecomment-112425363
Received on Tuesday, 16 June 2015 13:19:55 UTC