- From: Louay Bassbouss via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 08:57:45 +0000
- To: public-secondscreen@w3.org
Thx @hsablonniere I will consider your comments and discussion from #164. I think on protocols level it will easier to see the diff between 1-UA and 2-UA. On API level you don't see any diff between both cases since it is designed to consider both in the same way. @mfoltzgoogle @anssiko @all I would like to create a seperate markdown document (e.g. interoperability.md) and put everything related to this task there. What do you think? Von: Hubert SABLONNIÈRE [mailto:notifications@github.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 21. August 2015 14:52 An: w3c/presentation-api <presentation-api@noreply.github.com> Cc: Bassbouss, Louay <louay.bassbouss@fokus.fraunhofer.de> Betreff: Re: [presentation-api] Assess interoperability of Presentation API implementations (#153) @louaybassbouss<https://github.com/louaybassbouss> : As said in #164<https://github.com/w3c/presentation-api/issues/164>, I would really be interested in explicit definition of 1-UA and 2-UA but also in a relevant technologies and protocols as examples. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/w3c/presentation-api/issues/153#issuecomment-133416338>. -- GitHub Notif of comment by louaybassbouss See https://github.com/w3c/presentation-api/issues/153#issuecomment-134531122
Received on Tuesday, 25 August 2015 08:57:48 UTC