- From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 18:00:19 +0100
- To: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>, "'Kostiainen, Anssi'" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>, "'Rottsches, Dominik'" <dominik.rottsches@intel.com>, public-secondscreen@w3.org, public-webscreens@w3.org
Hi John, On 2014-11-21 17:22, John Foliot wrote: > Hi All, > > Allow me to very briefly introduce myself. My name is John Foliot, and I am > a web accessibility specialist. I spend a fair bit of my volunteer time at > the W3C, and related to "media / video", I was one of the authors of the > Media Accessibility User Requirements - > http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/media-a11y-reqs/. I follow this list mostly out of > interest, and to "keep an eye on" developments as they evolve. Thanks for keeping an eye on us! ;) > I am writing this group today to make a small but important request. Could I > ask that when posting to either of these lists, that the subject line > clearly indicate the list target? (For example, you will note I added > [Second Screen], which is a frequently used convention). As personally I > manage multiple W3C mailing lists in my inbox, this would make it extremely > simple to do: conversely an email with the subject line "Issue Priorities" > is, uhm, relatively vague when taken out of context. I'm not sure I'm following you here. Isn't the target list enough to identify the general context of the email? I don't think I've ever seen a group at W3C prefixing all emails with the name of the mailing-list itself. Quickly looking at the archives of the Protocols and Formats Working Group [1] for instance, I don't see any prefix being used there either. Groups such as the WebApps WG typically adopt such conventions to identify the spec an email is about when they manage multiple specs, but the Second Screen Presentation Working Group has only one spec on its plate for the time being. Thanks, Francois. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2014Nov/
Received on Friday, 21 November 2014 17:00:42 UTC