Re: **Call for consensus**: publication of update of Time Ontology in OWL

I updated the transition request yesterday and it is queued up for
Director review tomorrow

https://github.com/w3c/transitions/issues/228

On Thu, 2020-03-12 at 11:06 +0000, Linda van den Brink wrote:
> Hi all, 
> 
> I received no objections to the publication of the latest Editor's
> Draft of the Time Ontology in OWL document as a as a replacement for
> the current Recommendation. 
> 
> Ted, Simon, the CR Update request can be made, now. 
> 
> Linda
> 
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Little, Chris <chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk> 
> Verzonden: woensdag 26 februari 2020 17:12
> Aan: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>; 
> public-sdwig@w3.org
> Onderwerp: RE: **Call for consensus**: publication of update of Time
> Ontology in OWL 
> 
> Linda,
> 
> Quiet consent from me!
> 
> Chris
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl> 
> Sent: 20 February 2020 07:22
> To: public-sdwig@w3.org
> Subject: **Call for consensus**: publication of update of Time
> Ontology in OWL 
> 
> Hello Spatial Data on the Web Working Group participants,
> 
> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to request publication of the
> latest Editor's Draft of the Time Ontology in OWL document as a as a
> replacement for the current Recommendation (
> https://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/).
> 
> The latest Editor's Draft is available at:
>  https://w3c.github.io/sdw/time/ 
> 
> Main changes:
> - adds a section on IANA Considerations 
> https://w3c.github.io/sdw/time/#iana-links . This was added back in
> September #1138 . The is an 'erratum' - it changes nothing, merely
> adding a section that re-describes material that was already present
> in the document in the form required by IANA. 
> - addresses issues:
>  https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1014
>  https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1114
>  https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1161
> 
> Please let us know if you have any concerns by next Thursday 5 March
> 2020.
> Silence is considered consent.
> 
> 
> Thanks, 
> Linda van den Brink
> SDWIG Chair
> 
-- 
Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
W3C Automotive Lead
https://www.w3.org/auto