Re: Reminder: Next week focus week September

For the connection of SDW with Tech Trends:

- “Spatial Data on Web” meta-trend has been updated based on the discussion in the telecon on August 14th
 https://github.com/opengeospatial/OGC-Technology-Trends/blob/master/chapter-05.adoc 

- Comments on Trends can be made in two ways:
 - Each Trend has an Issue - comments can be made there
 - Members of the group (now including Linda and Joe) should be able to fork and do a pull request - not yet verified.

- Next telecon for coordination of SDWIG and Tech Trends will be in October before the TPAC.

Cheers,
George


> On Sep 3, 2018, at 1:13 PM, Michael J Gordon <Michael.Gordon@os.uk> wrote:
> 
> Hi folks,
>  
> For the Spatial Data on the Web Best Practices, I’d say we’ve made great progress on the implementation reports <https://github.com/w3c/sdw/blob/gh-pages/bp/BP-implementation-reports.md> – it would be useful for folks to review them and raise any bugs / issues / questions.
>  
> Cheers,
> Michael
>  
> From: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl <mailto:l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>> 
> Sent: 31 August 2018 06:51
> To: 'public-sdwig@w3.org <mailto:public-sdwig@w3.org>' <public-sdwig@w3.org <mailto:public-sdwig@w3.org>>
> Cc: Jeremy Tandy (jeremy.tandy@gmail.com <mailto:jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>) <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com <mailto:jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>>
> Subject: Reminder: Next week focus week September
>  
> Hi SDWIG-ers, 
>  
> Next week it is that time of the month again: focus week for the SDWIG. Jeremy won’t be available, so it’s just me cheering you on this time.
>  
> The things you can focus on can be found on our Projects page [1]. @Bill, @Michael, @Rob, @Peter, @Armin, please let the group know what we can do to bring your work further along!
>  
> One item I’d like to draw your attention to is the question whether we, as a group, should communicate to the CityGML working group, over at OGC, how important we consider implementation evidence before standardizing a theoretical model (see issue #1069 [2]). This relates to CityJSON, which could be one of these implementations. We should resolve this question during this week in order to bring our opinion forward, *if we decide we want to*, at the OGC meeting.
>  
> [1]: https://github.com/w3c/sdw/projects <https://github.com/w3c/sdw/projects>
> [2]:  https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1069 <https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1069>
>  
> Linda
> 
> 
> This email is only intended for the person to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential information. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email which must not be copied, distributed or disclosed to any other person.
> 
> Unless stated otherwise, the contents of this email are personal to the writer and do not represent the official view of Ordnance Survey. Nor can any contract be formed on Ordnance Survey's behalf via email. We reserve the right to monitor emails and attachments without prior notice.
> 
> Thank you for your cooperation.
> 
> Ordnance Survey Limited (Company Registration number 09121572)
> Registered Office: Explorer House
> Adanac Drive
> Southampton SO16 0AS
> Tel: 03456 050505
> http://www.os.uk <http://www.os.uk/>