- From: Simon Cox via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 21:54:39 +0000
- To: public-sdwig@w3.org
> I would be against this change as discussed before as it leaves the other SOSA properties in the limbo. In what way? > Also, the name is really misleading wrt rdf:hasProperty. I can't find `rdf:hasProperty` anywhere (or in RDFS either). I agree that the name is very generic, but I think that is intentional. This really is intended to indicate that a FeatureOfInterest is characterized at least in part by this property. The definition is the same as ssn:hasProperty, its just that it looks like a bit of an outlier that this is not available to users of the core part of the vocabulary - i.e. SOSA. > Is all we are trying to say that if an FOI has an observed property (via an observation) then this property is a property of the FOI? Yes. If an observation makes an estimate of an observed property, concerning a feature of interest, then that property must be related to the feature of interest. -- GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1006#issuecomment-432435383 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2018 21:54:40 UTC