Re: [sdw] Group review of roadmap

We will discuss the roadmap at the next f2f meeting. I would like input and discussion on the following: 
- The current grouping into categories. The "transform" category may not work - or would it help to simply rename it to "Partition"? Can we come up with different categories?
- Is there a standard that can be added that does partitioning for raster data? 
- Do we want other functionality in the roadmap tables instead of the column listing browser implementations? 

Any other input / discussion is also welcome. 

This could become a good resource, providing a compact overview of the spatial web standards landscape. Let's put some thought into it!

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by lvdbrink
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1065#issuecomment-426217595 using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2018 09:58:51 UTC