- From: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 09:34:05 +0000
- To: "public-sdwig@w3.org" <public-sdwig@w3.org>, "Tandy, Jeremy (jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk)" <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
Hi group, As you can see I've done a little work on the roadmap. Next week is the first week of July which means it's time for our SDWIG activity days. However, I'm going to be on holiday... That's why I worked on this today. When you work on SDW related things next week, could you please look at the roadmap grouping proposal and provide feedback? Also, feel free to do some work on it yourself if you have a good idea or want to take this a step further! Linda -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Linda van den Brink via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org> Verzonden: dinsdag 26 juni 2018 11:25 Aan: public-sdwig@w3.org Onderwerp: Re: [sdw] List & group features Based on the ideas of @tidoust and the input of @MichaelGordon I created a new [grouping proposal][1]. It looks as though it could work to create a roadmap with four main groups: - capturing spatial data - represeting spatial data - publishing spatial data - transforming spatial data The first and last groups are smaller than the second and third. I'm not convinced the last group 'transforming spatial data' will work as well as the others. Comments and proposals are welcome! Once we have the main groups (or decide to have just 1 main group and 1 roadmap page, but I'm in favour of going with these 3 or 4 groups) we can start creating the roadmap and describing and categorizing all the features (well-deployed, in progress, not web-friendly enough). [1]: https://github.com/w3c/sdw/blob/gh-pages/roadmap/analysis.md#step-2-grouping -- GitHub Notification of comment by lvdbrink Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1030#issuecomment-400242297 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2018 09:34:30 UTC