- From: kjano via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 22:29:39 +0000
- To: public-sdwig@w3.org
I would simply state that observedProperty is a sub-property of hasProperty. Jano On 02/08/2018 02:26 PM, Simon Cox wrote: > > I can see that there may be some rules involving property-chains, but > they are non-trivial - not sure they can be expressed in OWL. > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1004#issuecomment-364269852>, or > mute the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABrH9sY8eyhZrvH-OXOJFcT0URwp2zMUks5tS3SlgaJpZM4R6Tpx>. > -- Krzysztof Janowicz Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara 4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060 Email: jano@geog.ucsb.edu Webpage: http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/ Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net -- GitHub Notification of comment by kjano Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1004#issuecomment-364270601 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2018 22:29:42 UTC