Re: Next plenary call on 7 February 2018 - 2000 UTC

Hi Jeremy

I'm happy with an all-in-it-together plan for the Amersfoort meeting.
Everyone getting to know each other (who doesn't already) and learning
who's doing what in the group will be the most important thing.

For the stats work, what I was aiming to cover was:
- what additional use cases do we need to get reasonable coverage
- agree on the style and rough level of detail to apply in the write-ups of
each use case
- go through individual use cases and discuss/clarify the scope and main
purpose of each
- review existing standards, guidance and examples in this area that we
ought to know about, with some quick initial assessment of relevance of each
- if time and agenda permits, add more words to the use case document (that
was what I meant by 'hands on' work)

Cheers

Bill

On 30 January 2018 at 12:04, Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Bill
>
> Thanks for “surrendering” the slot on 7-Feb :-)
>
> > What is the process for working out the agenda for the F2F meeting?
>
> That’s the main topic of the plenary teleconference call now scheduled for
> next week.
>
> > In our Stats call last week, we figured we could use at least half a day
> to do some hands-on work on the Stats stuff, though that could be a
> 'parallel session' alongside other sub-groups.
>
> I am inclined to agree with François in avoiding parallel sessions: at
> this first F2F I hope to get cohesion across all the sub-groups ...
> but you say “hands-on”; suggesting that you might want to do some actual
> _work_!
>
> What did you have in mind for the hands-on stuff?
>
> Jeremy
>
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2018 at 09:05, François Daoust <fd@w3.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Bill,
>>
>> I'll let chairs chime in to respond to agenda questions. This all sounds
>> good to me. I would personally prefer not to run parallel sessions at
>> the F2F.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Francois.
>>
>>
>> Le 29/01/2018 à 18:02, Bill Roberts a écrit :
>> > Hi Francois
>> >
>> > We were intending to have a Stats on the Web BP subgroup call at that
>> > time on 7 Feb, but appreciate the need to schedule a plenary call.  The
>> > following week I am on leave, but in any case the next Wednesday slot
>> > (14 Feb) is only a few days before the face to face meeting, and in the
>> > normal run of things would be lined up for a Spatial Data BP subgroup
>> call.
>> >
>> > So I propose we include a short report on Stats progress in the 7 Feb
>> > plenary call, then have the next in-depth discussion of stats work at
>> > the F2F meeting.
>> >
>> > What is the process for working out the agenda for the F2F meeting?  In
>> > our Stats call last week, we figured we could use at least half a day to
>> > do some hands-on work on the Stats stuff, though that could be a
>> > 'parallel session' alongside other sub-groups.
>> >
>> > Maybe something to discuss in the plenary call next week?
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> >
>> > Bill
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 29 January 2018 at 13:09, Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org
>> > <mailto:fd@w3.org>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     Hi all,
>> >
>> >     The plenary call was supposed to take place this week, but our
>> >     chairs are unfortunately unavailable, so the plenary call will be
>> >     next week instead, on 7 February 2018 (still at 2000 UTC). An agenda
>> >     will be shared with the group before the call.
>> >
>> >     In the meantime, please remember to register for the upcoming F2F,
>> >     19-20 February:
>> >     https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/102593/sdwig-f2F-2018-q1/
>> >     <https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/102593/sdwig-f2F-2018-q1/>
>> >
>> >     Subgroup chairs, this change most likely affects your schedule, let
>> >     me know what you'd like to do! Slot on 31 January is now free to
>> >     use... and slot on 7 February is no longer available!
>> >
>> >     Thanks,
>> >     Francois.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>