public-sdw-wg@w3.org from March 2017 by author

andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu

• RE: SDW @ RDA P9? (Wednesday, 29 March)
• RE: SDW @ RDA P9? (Friday, 24 March)
• RE: SDW @ RDA P9? (Thursday, 23 March)
• RE: BP sub-group call Wed 15 March 16:00UTC (Tuesday, 14 March)
• RE: BP8 (web friendly geometries) - compactness, compression, simplification [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Friday, 10 March)
• RE: [SDWWG] SDW Next Plenary Meeting - 8th March 20:00 GMT (Wednesday, 8 March)
• RE: Comments on how to represent licenses in ontologies (and on the licenses themselves) (Monday, 6 March)
• RE: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 13 - Provide subsets for large spatial datasets (Friday, 3 March)
• RE: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 12 - Include search capability in your data access API (Friday, 3 March)
• RE: Cross-referencing examples (was: BP sub-group call, Wed 1 March @ 16:00utc) (Wednesday, 1 March)
• RE: Rendering problem of BP doc on GH (Wednesday, 1 March)
• RE: Rendering problem of BP doc on GH (Wednesday, 1 March)
• RE: BP sub-group call, Wed 1 March @ 16:00utc (Wednesday, 1 March)
• RE: Respec problem? (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Rendering problem of BP doc on GH (Wednesday, 1 March)

Andy Mabbett

• Meta: Use of ORCID iDs on acknowledgements page (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Monday, 27 March)
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Friday, 24 March)

Antoine Zimmermann

• Re: [w3c/sdw] implemented resolution 10 to 13 of call 28-02-17 (#592) (Tuesday, 7 March)

Armin Haller

• [ssn] Out of schedule meeting to resolve/close issues (Wednesday, 29 March)
• Re: Measurement properties for Actuators ? (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Re: About MinCardinality 0 on Observation (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Agenda SSN meeting this week - 28-03-17 20:00 - 22:00 UTC (Monday, 27 March)
• Re: Remaining Options for SOSA-SSN Integration, Was: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Tuesday, 21 March)
• Agenda SSN meeting this week - 14-03-17 20:00 - 22:00 UTC (Monday, 13 March)
• Re: SOSA/SSN namespaces - ontology (Thursday, 9 March)
• Extended 2 hour SDW SSN subgroup calls (Thursday, 9 March)
• Re: SOSA/SSN namespaces - ontology (Wednesday, 8 March)
• Re: Naming the properties between FeatureOfInterest, xxxProperty, {Actuator/Sensor}, {Actuation/Observation} (Wednesday, 8 March)
• Agenda SSN meeting this week - 07-03-17 21:00 UTC (Monday, 6 March)
• Re: Best Practices presentation (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Best Practices presentation (Wednesday, 1 March)

Bart van Leeuwen

• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API (Friday, 3 March)

Bill Roberts

• Re: Special "issue resolution webex" for BP Note: Wed 5-April, 14-16:00utc (Friday, 31 March)
• suggest no coverage call this week (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Coverage JSON vote tomorrow (Monday, 20 March)
• QB4ST pull requests (Saturday, 18 March)
• Coverage call this week (Monday, 13 March)
• QB4ST comments (Monday, 13 March)
• EO-QB comments (Monday, 13 March)
• Re: Inclusion of non-geometric ways to describe location (e.g. address and geocode) in BP10? (Monday, 13 March)
• Re: Inclusion of non-geometric ways to describe location (e.g. address and geocode) in BP10? (Saturday, 11 March)
• Re: Inclusion of non-geometric ways to describe location (e.g. address and geocode) in BP10? (Saturday, 11 March)
• apologies for SDW call tonight (Wednesday, 8 March)

Bruce Bannerman

• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Monday, 27 March)
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Sunday, 26 March)
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: BP8 (web friendly geometries) - compactness, compression, simplification [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Monday, 13 March)

Clemens Portele

• Re: another minor edit for BP11 (Friday, 31 March)
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: [BP] Reordering the best practices (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? (Wednesday, 15 March)
• Re: BP sub-group call Wed 15 March 16:00UTC (Monday, 13 March)
• Re: BP: updates to section 12.6, removal of section 12.8 (Saturday, 11 March)
• BP: updates to section 12.6, removal of section 12.8 (Saturday, 11 March)
• Re: BP8 (web friendly geometries) - compactness, compression, simplification (Thursday, 9 March)
• Re: Is SDW-BP section 12.8 "Dealing with large datasets" needed anymore? (Thursday, 9 March)
• Re: [SDWWG] SDW Next Plenary Meeting - 8th March 20:00 GMT (Monday, 6 March)
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API (Friday, 3 March)
• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 13 - Provide subsets for large spatial datasets (Thursday, 2 March)
• Re: Respec problem? (Thursday, 2 March)
• WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 12 - Include search capability in your data access API (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 13 - Provide subsets for large spatial datasets (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Re: BP 11 - 'convenience APIs' (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Re: BP 11 - 'convenience APIs' (Wednesday, 1 March)
• BP 11 - 'convenience APIs' (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Re: Respec problem? (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Respec problem? (Wednesday, 1 March)

Ed Parsons

• Re: [BP] Reordering the best practices (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: [BP] Reordering the best practices (Thursday, 30 March)
• Fwd: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Monday, 27 March)
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Monday, 27 March)
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Do we need to reference all three sets of spatial relations from GeoSPARQL in BP14? (Tuesday, 14 March)
• SDW Next Plenary Meeting - 8th March 20:00 GMT (Monday, 6 March)
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API (Friday, 3 March)
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API (Friday, 3 March)
• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 12 - Include search capability in your data access API (Thursday, 2 March)

Francois Daoust

• RE: Special "issue resolution webex" for BP Note: Wed 5-April, 14-16:00utc (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: BP doc is ready for publication (Wednesday, 29 March)
• [Minutes BP] 2017-03-29 (Wednesday, 29 March)
• [minutes SSN] 2017-03-28 (Wednesday, 29 March)
• Timeline to reach REC by end of June for SSN and Time ontologies (Monday, 27 March)
• RE: [SDWWG] SDW Next Plenary Meeting - 8th March 20:00 GMT (Wednesday, 8 March)
• [Minutes SSN] 2017-03-07 (Wednesday, 8 March)
• RE: Comments on how to represent licenses in ontologies (and on the licenses themselves) (Monday, 6 March)
• [Minutes BP] 2017-03-01 call (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Cross-referencing examples (was: BP sub-group call, Wed 1 March @ 16:00utc) (Wednesday, 1 March)
• RE: Rendering problem of BP doc on GH (Wednesday, 1 March)

Frans Knibbe

• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Monday, 27 March)
• Re: A blog post and a (good? best?) practice (Friday, 17 March)
• A blog post and a (good? best?) practice (Thursday, 16 March)
• Re: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? (Thursday, 16 March)
• Re: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? (Thursday, 16 March)

Ghislain Atemezing

• Re: summary of open discussion threads for BP doc as input to plenary call 8-March-2017 (Wednesday, 8 March)
• Re: summary of open discussion threads for BP doc as input to plenary call 8-March-2017 (Wednesday, 8 March)

Jeremy Tandy

• Re: Special "issue resolution webex" for BP Note: Wed 5-April, 14-16:00utc (Friday, 31 March)
• Re: Meta: Use of ORCID iDs on acknowledgements page (Friday, 31 March)
• Re: Meta: Use of ORCID iDs on acknowledgements page (Friday, 31 March)
• Re: another minor edit for BP11 (Friday, 31 March)
• another minor edit for BP11 (Friday, 31 March)
• Re: Special "issue resolution webex" for BP Note: Wed 5-April, 14-16:00utc (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: [BP] Reordering the best practices (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: Meta: Use of ORCID iDs on acknowledgements page (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: [BP] Reordering the best practices (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: [BP] Reordering the best practices (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: [BP] Reordering the best practices (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: [BP] Reordering the best practices (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: Special "issue resolution webex" for BP Note: Wed 5-April, 14-16:00utc (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: Actions in "final" best practice sprint (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: Special "issue resolution webex" for BP Note: Wed 5-April, 14-16:00utc (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: Special "issue resolution webex" for BP Note: Wed 5-April, 14-16:00utc (Thursday, 30 March)
• Actions in "final" best practice sprint (Thursday, 30 March)
• Special "issue resolution webex" for BP Note: Wed 5-April, 14-16:00utc (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: BP doc is ready for publication (Wednesday, 29 March)
• Re: Timeline to reach REC by end of June for SSN and Time ontologies (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Re: BP sub-group call, Wednesday 29-March, 15:00UTC (Tuesday, 28 March)
• BP sub-group call, Wednesday 29-March, 15:00UTC (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Re: Timeline to reach REC by end of June for SSN and Time ontologies (Tuesday, 28 March)
• BP doc is ready for publication (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Summary of Best Practice sub-group discussions from Day 1 of Delft face-to-face (Monday, 20 March)
• Re: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? (Wednesday, 15 March)
• Re: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? (Wednesday, 15 March)
• Re: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? (Wednesday, 15 March)
• Re: Do we need to reference all three sets of spatial relations from GeoSPARQL in BP14? (Wednesday, 15 March)
• Re: Do we need to reference all three sets of spatial relations from GeoSPARQL in BP14? (Wednesday, 15 March)
• Re: [public-sdw-wg] <none> (Tuesday, 14 March)
• Do we need to reference all three sets of spatial relations from GeoSPARQL in BP14? (Tuesday, 14 March)
• Re: BP8 (web friendly geometries) - compactness, compression, simplification [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Tuesday, 14 March)
• Call review of BPs 14, 17 and 3 (Tuesday, 14 March)
• Re: [BP] Updates to BP6 (Tuesday, 14 March)
• Re: Inclusion of non-geometric ways to describe location (e.g. address and geocode) in BP10? (Saturday, 11 March)
• Re: BP: updates to section 12.6, removal of section 12.8 (Saturday, 11 March)
• Re: Inclusion of non-geometric ways to describe location (e.g. address and geocode) in BP10? (Saturday, 11 March)
• Re: Inclusion of non-geometric ways to describe location (e.g. address and geocode) in BP10? (Saturday, 11 March)
• Re: BP: updates to section 12.6, removal of section 12.8 (Saturday, 11 March)
• Inclusion of non-geometric ways to describe location (e.g. address and geocode) in BP10? (Saturday, 11 March)
• Re: BP8 (web friendly geometries) - compactness, compression, simplification (Thursday, 9 March)
• BP8 (web friendly geometries) - compactness, compression, simplification (Thursday, 9 March)
• Re: Is SDW-BP section 12.8 "Dealing with large datasets" needed anymore? (Thursday, 9 March)
• Is SDW-BP section 12.8 "Dealing with large datasets" needed anymore? (Thursday, 9 March)
• Re: summary of open discussion threads for BP doc as input to plenary call 8-March-2017 (Wednesday, 8 March)
• Re: summary of open discussion threads for BP doc as input to plenary call 8-March-2017 (Wednesday, 8 March)
• summary of open discussion threads for BP doc as input to plenary call 8-March-2017 (Wednesday, 8 March)
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API (Tuesday, 7 March)
• More updates to CRS-related best practices (Tuesday, 7 March)
• Re: Lars's comments on the BP document (was: BP document is FROZEN pending vote to release next WD) (Tuesday, 7 March)
• updates to BP17 (coordinate reference systems) (Sunday, 5 March)
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API (Friday, 3 March)
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API (Friday, 3 March)
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API (Friday, 3 March)
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API (Friday, 3 March)
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API (Friday, 3 March)
• CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API (Friday, 3 March)
• Updates to BP detailed plan for this sprint (Friday, 3 March)
• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 13 - Provide subsets for large spatial datasets (Thursday, 2 March)
• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 13 - Provide subsets for large spatial datasets (Thursday, 2 March)
• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 12 - Include search capability in your data access API (Thursday, 2 March)
• topics for SDW plenary call next week (8 March) (Thursday, 2 March)
• Re: Best Practices presentation (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Re: BP 11 - 'convenience APIs' (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Re: BP 11 - 'convenience APIs' (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Re: BP 11 - 'convenience APIs' (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Re: BP 11 - 'convenience APIs' (Wednesday, 1 March)

Jon Blower

• Re: Meta: Use of ORCID iDs on acknowledgements page (Friday, 31 March)
• Re: Meta: Use of ORCID iDs on acknowledgements page (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Monday, 27 March)
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Monday, 27 March)
• Examples of CoverageJSON documents (Friday, 17 March)
• Re: Coverage call this week (Wednesday, 15 March)

Joshua Lieberman

• Re: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? (Sunday, 19 March)
• Re: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? (Thursday, 16 March)
• Re: [public-sdw-wg] <none> (Tuesday, 14 March)
• Re: BP8 (web friendly geometries) - compactness, compression, simplification [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Tuesday, 14 March)
• Re: Inclusion of non-geometric ways to describe location (e.g. address and geocode) in BP10? (Saturday, 11 March)
• Re: Comments on how to represent licenses in ontologies (and on the licenses themselves) (Monday, 6 March)
• Re: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API (Friday, 3 March)

Kerry Taylor

• RE: Remaining Options for SOSA-SSN Integration, Was: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Tuesday, 21 March)
• RE: [Minutes SSN] 2017 03 15 (Monday, 20 March)
• RE: [w3c/sdw] implemented resolution 10 to 13 of call 28-02-17 (#592) (Tuesday, 7 March)
• RE: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Tuesday, 7 March)
• RE: A few issues and questions about SOSA, and a very nice picture ! (Tuesday, 7 March)
• RE: Best Practices presentation (Sunday, 5 March)

Kolozali, Sefki

• Re: [SDWWG] SDW Next Plenary Meeting - 8th March 20:00 GMT (Wednesday, 8 March)

Krzysztof Janowicz

• Re: Meta: Use of ORCID iDs on acknowledgements page (Friday, 31 March)
• Re: Using rdf:Property class for properties whose URI contains string "time" (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Re: Using rdf:Property class for properties whose URI contains string "time" (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Re: ACTION-282: Draft a note on forecasting to address issue-82. (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Re: About MinCardinality 0 on Observation (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Re: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? (Thursday, 16 March)
• Re: summary of open discussion threads for BP doc as input to plenary call 8-March-2017 (Wednesday, 8 March)
• Re: hasResult / Sampling in SOSA (Friday, 3 March)
• Re: Sampling model (Wednesday, 1 March)

Linda van den Brink

• RE: [BP] Reordering the best practices (Thursday, 30 March)
• RE: [BP] Reordering the best practices (Thursday, 30 March)
• RE: [BP] Reordering the best practices (Thursday, 30 March)
• RE: Special "issue resolution webex" for BP Note: Wed 5-April, 14-16:00utc (Thursday, 30 March)
• [BP] Reordering the best practices (Wednesday, 29 March)
• RE: A blog post and a (good? best?) practice (Friday, 17 March)
• BP document FROZEN - vote next Monday (Thursday, 16 March)
• RE: [BP] Updates to BP6 (Tuesday, 14 March)
• RE: BP8 (web friendly geometries) - compactness, compression, simplification [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Tuesday, 14 March)
• [BP] Updates to BP6 (Tuesday, 14 March)
• BP sub-group call Wed 15 March 16:00UTC (Monday, 13 March)
• RE: BP8 (web friendly geometries) - compactness, compression, simplification [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Friday, 10 March)
• RE: [SDWWG] SDW Next Plenary Meeting - 8th March 20:00 GMT (Monday, 6 March)
• [BP] Next WD release (Monday, 6 March)
• RE: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 13 - Provide subsets for large spatial datasets (Friday, 3 March)
• RE: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 12 - Include search capability in your data access API (Friday, 3 March)
• RE: Rendering problem of BP doc on GH (Wednesday, 1 March)
• RE: Best Practices presentation (Wednesday, 1 March)

Little, Chris

• RE: [public-sdw-wg] <none> (Tuesday, 14 March)
• RE: QB4ST comments (Monday, 13 March)
• w3c/ogc sdw wg time ISSUES (Wednesday, 8 March)
• RE: ACTION-257: Ask sefki kolozali to make proposal around trss for the owl time ontology (Spatial Data on the Web Working Group) (Wednesday, 8 March)
• RE: ISSUE-144 - OWL-Time - missing interval relations (Wednesday, 8 March)
• RE: [SDWWG] SDW Next Plenary Meeting - 8th March 20:00 GMT (Wednesday, 8 March)

Matthew Perry

• Re: Do we need to reference all three sets of spatial relations from GeoSPARQL in BP14? (Tuesday, 14 March)
• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 12 - Include search capability in your data access API (Friday, 3 March)

Maxime LEFRANCOIS

• Re: Using rdf:Property class for properties whose URI contains string "time" (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Re: Sampling model (Wednesday, 1 March)

Maxime Lefrançois

• Using rdf:Property class for properties whose URI contains string "time" (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Re: ACTION-282: Draft a note on forecasting to address issue-82. (Tuesday, 28 March)
• MeasurementRange is at odds with OperatingRange and SurvivalRange (Monday, 27 March)
• Measurement properties for Actuators ? (Monday, 27 March)
• If an observation observes a property, then it also observes the feature of interest of this property ? (Monday, 27 March)
• If an observation used a procedure, then the sensor that made the observation does implement that procedure ? (Monday, 27 March)
• About MinCardinality 0 on Observation (Monday, 27 March)
• ACTION-282: Draft a note on forecasting to address issue-82. (Monday, 27 March)
• Remaining Options for SOSA-SSN Integration, Was: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Monday, 20 March)
• Re: Link between FeatureOfInterest and xxxProperty (Monday, 20 March)
• Naming the properties between FeatureOfInterest, xxxProperty, {Actuator/Sensor}, {Actuation/Observation} (Wednesday, 8 March)
• Re: A few issues and questions about SOSA, and a very nice picture ! (Tuesday, 7 March)
• Re: [w3c/sdw] implemented resolution 10 to 13 of call 28-02-17 (#592) (Tuesday, 7 March)
• Re: [w3c/sdw] Implementation of isObservedBy issue https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/… (#591) (Thursday, 2 March)

p.barnaghi@surrey.ac.uk

• Re: [SDWWG] SDW Next Plenary Meeting - 8th March 20:00 GMT (Monday, 6 March)

Phil Archer

• Re: [Minutes SSN] 2017 03 15 (Monday, 20 March)
• [Minutes COV] 2017 03 15 (Wednesday, 15 March)
• [Minutes BP] 2017 13 15 (Wednesday, 15 March)
• [Minutes SSN] 2017 03 15 (Wednesday, 15 March)

Raúl García Castro

• Re: [ssn] Out of schedule meeting to resolve/close issues (Friday, 31 March)
• Re: Proposal to fix ISSUE-117 and a question (Wednesday, 29 March)
• Re: Using rdf:Property class for properties whose URI contains string "time" (Wednesday, 29 March)
• Proposal to fix ISSUE-117 and a question (Friday, 17 March)
• Comments on how to represent licenses in ontologies (and on the licenses themselves) (Monday, 6 March)

Rob Atkinson

• Re: Remaining Options for SOSA-SSN Integration, Was: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Tuesday, 21 March)
• Re: Remaining Options for SOSA-SSN Integration, Was: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Tuesday, 21 March)
• Re: Remaining Options for SOSA-SSN Integration, Was: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Tuesday, 21 March)
• Re: Remaining Options for SOSA-SSN Integration, Was: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Tuesday, 21 March)
• Re: Remaining Options for SOSA-SSN Integration, Was: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Monday, 20 March)
• Triple Pattern Fragments (Monday, 20 March)
• Re: QB4ST pull requests (Saturday, 18 March)
• Re: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? (Thursday, 16 March)
• Re: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? (Thursday, 16 March)
• Re: QB4ST comments (Monday, 13 March)
• [public-sdw-wg] <none> (Monday, 13 March)
• Re: SOSA/SSN namespaces - ontology (Thursday, 9 March)
• SOSA/SSN namespaces - ontology (Wednesday, 8 March)
• SSN integration: comments on options, (Tuesday, 7 March)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Tuesday, 7 March)
• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 12 - Include search capability in your data access API (Friday, 3 March)
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Re: Respec problem? (Wednesday, 1 March)

Scott Simmons

• Re: Timeline to reach REC by end of June for SSN and Time ontologies (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Re: BP sub-group call, Wednesday 29-March, 15:00UTC (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Re: Timeline to reach REC by end of June for SSN and Time ontologies (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Re: Agenda SSN meeting this week - 28-03-17 20:00 - 22:00 UTC (Monday, 27 March)
• Re: Coverage call this week (Tuesday, 14 March)
• Re: Agenda SSN meeting this week - 14-03-17 20:00 - 22:00 UTC (Monday, 13 March)
• Re: BP sub-group call Wed 15 March 16:00UTC (Monday, 13 March)
• regrets for SSN call today (Tuesday, 7 March)
• Re: Comments on how to represent licenses in ontologies (and on the licenses themselves) (Monday, 6 March)
• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 12 - Include search capability in your data access API (Friday, 3 March)

Simon.Cox@csiro.au

• RE: Meta: Use of ORCID iDs on acknowledgements page (Thursday, 30 March)
• ACTION-300: Include OBOE alignment ... (Wednesday, 29 March)
• ACTION-299: Include Sample relation text ... (Wednesday, 29 March)
• RE: ACTION-282: Draft a note on forecasting to address issue-82. (Tuesday, 28 March)
• RE: CRS best practices: Google Geocoding API [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Monday, 27 March)
• RE: About MinCardinality 0 on Observation (Monday, 27 March)
• RE: SDW @ RDA P9? (Friday, 24 March)
• Status of OWL-Time (Wednesday, 22 March)
• RE: Remaining Options for SOSA-SSN Integration, Was: SOSA/SSN integration architecture (Tuesday, 21 March)
• General purpose temporal predicates - ISSUE-65 (Monday, 20 March)
• RE: [Minutes SSN] 2017 03 15 (Monday, 20 March)
• OWL-Time: Standard temporal durations = temporal units of measure (Monday, 20 March)
• [public-sdw-wg] <none> (Tuesday, 14 March)
• RE: Naming the properties between FeatureOfInterest, xxxProperty, {Actuator/Sensor}, {Actuation/Observation} [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Wednesday, 8 March)
• RE: ISSUE-144 - OWL-Time - missing interval relations (Wednesday, 8 March)
• RE: ISSUE-144 - OWL-Time - missing interval relations (Wednesday, 8 March)
• Re: Naming the properties between FeatureOfInterest, xxxProperty, {Actuator/Sensor}, {Actuation/Observation} (Wednesday, 8 March)
• RE: SSN - alignment of OBOE to SOSA (Tuesday, 7 March)
• RE: Comments on how to represent licenses in ontologies (and on the licenses themselves) (Monday, 6 March)
• SSN - alignment of OBOE to SOSA (Sunday, 5 March)
• RE: Sampling model (Wednesday, 1 March)

Stephane Fellah

• Re: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? (Wednesday, 15 March)

Svensson, Lars

• RE: Special "issue resolution webex" for BP Note: Wed 5-April, 14-16:00utc (Thursday, 30 March)
• RE: BP sub-group call, Wednesday 29-March, 15:00UTC (Wednesday, 29 March)
• RE: BP sub-group call, Wednesday 29-March, 15:00UTC (Tuesday, 28 March)
• RE: BP sub-group call Wed 15 March 16:00UTC (Wednesday, 15 March)
• RE: [BP] Updates to BP6 (Tuesday, 14 March)
• RE: Inclusion of non-geometric ways to describe location (e.g. address and geocode) in BP10? (Monday, 13 March)
• RE: Lars's comments on the BP document (was: BP document is FROZEN pending vote to release next WD) (Tuesday, 7 March)
• RE: BP sub-group call, Wed 1 March @ 16:00utc (Wednesday, 1 March)

Last message date: Friday, 31 March 2017 22:08:28 UTC