- From: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 21:58:32 +0100
- To: janowicz@ucsb.edu, Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>, Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au>, Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au>, "Simon.Cox@csiro.au" <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>, "phila@w3.org" <phila@w3.org>, "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: "ssimmons@opengeospatial.org" <ssimmons@opengeospatial.org>, "fd@w3.org" <fd@w3.org>
>> *Is there someone arguing for different namespaces willing to put the >> pro argument out there in public, please?* > > We have two namespaces already. They are in the public first working > draft. This is *not* an argument for having different namespaces. The whole point of working drafts is that they can entirely change, per W3C process. Raphaël -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Campus SophiaTech Data Science Department 450 route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Tuesday, 31 January 2017 20:59:18 UTC