BP sub-group call, Wed 1 March @ 16:00utc

Hi-

Agenda for tomorrow's call at 16:00utc is here [1]

Main talking points are:

   - Quick look at the detailed plan for the sprint leading up to
Delft F2F backlog
   and sprint plan
   <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Detailed_planning_BP_document>
   - Decision: are non-geographic CRS out of scope? (see ISSUE 392
   <https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/392>) ... none of our material covers
   this topic although we have non-geo use cases
   - (*Andrea <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/User:Aperego>*) Review
   progress on BP8 <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#describe-geometry> (geometry
   serialisation)
   - (*@clemens and @lars*) Discussion: refinement of recommendations for
   use of sitemaps in BP4
   <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#indexable-by-search-engines> (see [
   https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2017Feb/0242.html email)
   item (2) and responses
   - Decision: shall we recommend samePlaceAs property? (see discussion
   thread
   <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2017Feb/0532.html>)
   - Decision: shall we remove BP2 Provide context required to interpret
   data values <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#provide-context>? (see discussion
   thread
   <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2017Feb/0531.html>)


... and if we have time:

   - Discussion: how to represent bounding boxes (see discussion thread
   <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2017Feb/0418.html>)
   - (*@clemens*) Review progress on BP11: Expose spatial data through
   'convenience APIs' <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#convenience-apis>
   - Review proposals for CRS materials - §8 CRS Intro
   <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#CRS-background>, BP3
   <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#ref-crs> and BP17
   <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#bp-crs>


Busy!

Regrets already received from Bill.

Speak to you all tomorrow. Cheerio!

Jeremy

[1]: https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings:BP-Telecon20170301