Re: tidying ssn -- are you ok with?

I am certainly fine with SKOS if this is what most of us prefer. Armin, can
you put this onto our agenda for the next call?

On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 2:25 AM, <Simon.Cox@csiro.au> wrote:

> Btw I never intended to claim that skos was ideal here, but it was
> convenient to separate out the different annotations,. A simple SPARQL
> update could then finalise it to the predicate/namespace of choice.
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Krzysztof Janowicz <janowicz@ucsb.edu>
> *Sent:* Saturday, 4 February 2017 5:31:05 AM
> *To:* Kerry Taylor; SDW WG Public List
> *Subject:* Re: tidying ssn -- are you ok with?
>
> Hi Kerry,
>
> I think it would be great if we could discuss this in the group meeting
> next week. I would like to understand our motivation a bit better as well
> as some decisions that we are taking e.g., using skos:example without
> importing skos.
>
> Have a nice weekend
> Jano
>
>
> On 02/03/2017 09:15 PM, Kerry Taylor wrote:
>
> I’d like to follow the approach Simon used in sosa (as we discussed in a
> meeting last year, I think) to separate examples from descriptive comments
> in the ontology using skos:example.
>
>
>
> Are you ok with me doing the same in ssn? I don’t  plan to change the
> content substantively (although I might reword an example a little if it
> seems a bit too hard to follow e.g. too brief). And I’m not going to add
> amore examples at this point --- just move the ones already there.
>
>
>
> I will not import skos.
>
>
>
> Btw– I think this means specgen that we are currently using for the spec
> doco will no longer be able to extract the example – nor for sosa .
>
> -Kerry
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Krzysztof Janowicz
>
> Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara
> 4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060
>
> Email: jano@geog.ucsb.edu
> Webpage: http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/
> Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net
>
>