Re: New SSN requirement: programming/tasking and actuation

Hello,

I have just created ISSUE-77
<https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/77> for this topic, so that
we don't loose track of the issue.

Regards,
Frans

On 2 September 2016 at 14:33, Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl> wrote:

> Hi there!
>
> Action-196 <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/196> is about
> adding two requirements for the SSN deliverable to the UC&R document. This
> is a proposal for the second of those two requirements. This
> <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2016Sep/0022.html> is
> the thread for the other one.
>
> I propose to add the following requirement:
>
> *Tasking/programming and actuation.*
>
> *Requirement: *It should be possible to model tasking/programming and
> actuation of sensing devices.
>
> The terms tasking and programming are taken to mean the same: the
> assembly and transmission of instructions intended to control the behaviour
> of a sensing device. Actuation of a sensing device is its ability to change
> something in its environment upon receiving a signal.
> *Related deliverable: *SSN
> *Related use cases:*
> Driving To Work In The Snow
> <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#DrivingToWorkInTheSnow>
>
> <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#DrivingToWorkInTheSnow>
> Intelligent Transportation System
> <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#IntelligentTransportationSystem>
> Optimizing Energy Consumption, Production, Sales And Purchases In Smart
> Grids
> <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#OptimizingEnergyConsumptionProductionSalesAndPurchasesInSmartGrids>
> Smart Cities
> <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#SmartCities>
>
>
> Again I should note that so far I have tried the existing pool of use
> cases to support this requirement. If necessary, we could add use case from the
> set of use cases that underpinned the first version of SSN
> <https://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/XGR-ssn-20110628/#Motivating_Use_cases_.28Sensor_Web_and_Sensor_Networks.29>.
> My thought was that there are many use cases already, so if a new use case
> does not bring unique requirements to the table we should not add it.
>
> If you have any comments or suggestions, please make them known. The aim
> is to include this new requirement in the UCR version that will be frozen
> before TPAC, so there is not much time.
>
> Greetings,
> Frans
>