- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 07:11:39 -0000
- To: "Rob Atkinson" <rob@metalinkage.com.au>
- Cc: "Phil Archer" <phila@w3.org>, "Kerry Taylor" <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>, "SDW WG Public List" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
I don't think the question has been asked before. Our rules are for regularity in docs in /TR space. Stuff in places like /ns are much more open to whatever the community chooses. Phil > Does that mean we can use @en for any flavour of english we like and use > @en-US for americanised versions and make sure we add these? > > rob > > > On Fri, 27 May 2016 at 15:56 Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: > >> Thanks Kerry, I'll take it from here then. >> >> One of the joys of RDF is that you can add labels in as many languages >> as you like, so no need to worry about the language there. >> >> Phil >> >> On 27/05/2016 06:48, Kerry Taylor wrote: >> > I believe these are now all complete in the current version >> http://w3c.github.io/sdw/ssn/ >> > >> > It is possible there are some non-Americanisms in the ontology itself >> and therefore in its documentation. It would be incorrect to change >> these, >> I believe, if there are any. >> > >> > For the next release, does the W3C require that ontologies must have >> all >> the terms (and annotation properties) written in American, too? We will >> need to be careful going forward if this is the case. >> > >> > --Kerry >> > >> > >> >> -- >> >> >> Phil Archer >> W3C Data Activity Lead >> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ >> >> http://philarcher.org >> +44 (0)7887 767755 >> @philarcher1 >> >> > -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse typos.
Received on Friday, 27 May 2016 07:11:55 UTC