RE: Progress on Time deliverable

Thanks Andreas - 

* probably xsd:dateTime, since the time fragment is included ;-) 
* the examples carried over from the 2006 draft are essentially unchanged so far. Will probably be completely re-written to remove refs to technologies that are no longer part of our important stack
* Yep. Some datatype definitions not yet added to the documentation. 

Simon 

-----Original Message-----
From: Andreas Harth [mailto:harth@kit.edu] 
Sent: Friday, 20 May 2016 11:29 PM
To: public-sdw-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Progress on Time deliverable

Hi,

On 05/16/16 00:28, Simon.Cox@csiro.au wrote:
> I can now report that a complete working draft is available in the 
> Github repository, or in formatted view here:
> http://w3c.github.io/sdw/time/

a couple of comments:

* The literals in [1] (where it mentions "temporal reasoners") should probably be of xsd:date (e.g., "2006-11-05T18:00:00-5:00"^^xsd:date).
* There is a mention of OWL-S 0.9 in [2] (not sure how relevant OWL-S is in 2016; should probably be either DAML-S 0.9 or updated to OWL-S
1.2 or maybe just dropped).
* :genYear is mentioned in the listing in [3], but not explained anywhere in the text.

Cheers,
Andreas.

[1] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/time/#scheduling
[2] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/time/#commerce
[3] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/time/#different-TRS

Received on Sunday, 22 May 2016 23:19:55 UTC