Re: sub-group time slots in DST (BP and Coverage)

+1 

Thanks, 
Matt 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: eparsons@google.com 
To: l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl, jeremy.tandy@gmail.com, public-sdw-wg@w3.org 
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 4:50:09 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: sub-group time slots in DST (BP and Coverage) 



+1 works for me, looking forward to the double header ! 

Ed 


On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, 08:02 Linda van den Brink, < l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl > wrote: 






+1 no problem 



Van: Jeremy Tandy [mailto: jeremy.tandy@gmail.com ] 
Verzonden: woensdag 23 maart 2016 22:18 
Aan: SDW WG Public List; Linda van den Brink 
Onderwerp: sub-group time slots in DST (BP and Coverage) 






All - at the Best Practices call earlier today, we agreed to move the call to 13:00 UTC once daylight-savings catches up with us all. 





(that's 9:00 in Washington DC, 14:00 in the London, and 15:00 in Amsterdam) 





However (!) it seems that the coverage team have more need of that slot to cater for their Australian participants; 13:00 UTC is 23:00 in Canberra so there's no capacity to go any later than that! 





PROPOSED: 


    • Coverages sub-group meet at 13:00 UTC (9:00 in Washington DC, 14:00 in the London, 15:00 in Amsterdam and 23:00 in Canberra) 
    • Best Practices sub-group meet at 14:00 UTC (10:00 in Washington DC, 15:00 in the London, 16:00 in Amsterdam and 00:00+1day in Canberra ... but we don't have any participants from Australia) 



What do the Best Practice sub-team think ... especially Linda who raised the issue today. 





I'm looking for +1 (or -1) endorsements for the proposal ... 





BR, Jeremy 
-- 



Ed Parsons FRGS 
Geospatial Technologist, Google 

Google Voice +44 (0)20 7881 4501 
www.edparsons.com @edparsons