Re: time of coverage calls

Great. Good idea

Thanks Phil

> On 3 Mar 2016, at 19:05, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> OK, thanks Bill,
> 
> That means I won't set up a new WebEx slot, we can just use the existing one that we use at that time anyway.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Phil.
> 
>> On 03/03/2016 17:08, Bill Roberts wrote:
>> Hi all
>> 
>> I've reviewed all the responses I received to the mail around availability
>> to participate in coverage calls: many thanks for those.
>> 
>> There was no time that everyone could do, but the most votes were in favour
>> of the Wednesday 2000 UTC slot.
>> 
>> Bearing in mind Kerry's sensible recommendation in the call last night that
>> we stick to a single time, rather than varying from meeting to meeting, I
>> propose that we go ahead with that, on alternate weeks - when the plenary
>> meetings are not happening.
>> 
>> So the first meeting will be on 9 March at 2000 UTC
>> 
>> We may need to review this when daylight saving kicks in, as that will
>> change the time difference between UK and Australia from 11 hours to 9, and
>> might mean that another slot is preferable.
>> 
>> Apologies to those who can't make that time.  We'll endeavour to keep good
>> minutes and  conversations via the mailing list.
>> 
>> Thanks everyone
>> 
>> Bill
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> Phil Archer
> W3C Data Activity Lead
> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
> 
> http://philarcher.org
> +44 (0)7887 767755
> @philarcher1

Received on Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:39:49 UTC