Re: Proposal for SSN core

Maybe directly adding comments in Webprotege and then a mail to the list?

From: "Simon.Cox@csiro.au" <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
Date: Wednesday, 29 June 2016 6:53 am
To: Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au>, "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Cc: Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>, "janowicz@ucsb.edu" <janowicz@ucsb.edu>, "danh.lephuoc@deri.org" <danh.lephuoc@deri.org>
Subject: RE: Proposal for SSN core

What is the best way to make comments?

Simon

From: Armin Haller [mailto:armin.haller@anu.edu.au]
Sent: Monday, 27 June 2016 5:52 PM
To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Cc: Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>; Krzysztof Janowicz <janowicz@ucsb.edu>; danh.lephuoc@deri.org
Subject: Proposal for SSN core

Hi,

I have made and uploaded a proposal for the SSN core ontology at:

http://webprotege.stanford.edu/#Edit:projectId=32a4ea9e-4d06-4f92-8188-07fcd96f81a7


It is largely similar to what Krzysztof proposed on the Wiki: https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/SSN_core_modules


I added Actuators and called the core subsequently “Sensor and Actuator Core Ontology” aka “Sanda”. I also added domain and range as annotation properties, please check if you agree, but as discussed there should not be any domain and range restrictions in the core.

Cheers,
Armin