Re: SOSA - a strawman for modularizing the SSN ontology was RE: Detailed comments on SANDA

Fantastic! I am just looking at it. I am unsure whether rangeIncludes 
and domainIncludes should go in there as they have no formal semantics.  
This means that they are not part of the meta-language. This may turn 
out to be a problem. I have to think about this...

Thanks Simon!


On 07/04/2016 03:28 AM, Simon.Cox@csiro.au wrote:
>
> Folks – I’ve done some work today to turn Jano’s proposal for 
> modularization [1][2] into a more fully worked strawman.
>
> I’ve provisionally called it SOSA 
> (Sensing-Observations-Sampling-Actuation ontology) and loaded RDF 
> files into GitHub.
>
> See documentation here: 
> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/SOSA_Ontology
>
> Enjoy.
>
> Simon
>
> [1] 
> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Proposals_for_rewriting_SSN#Proposal_5_made_by_KJanowicz
>
> [2] https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/SSN_core_modules
>
> *From:*Simon.Cox@csiro.au [mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au]
> *Sent:* Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:51 AM
> *To:* armin.haller@anu.edu.au; public-sdw-wg@w3.org
> *Cc:* kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au; janowicz@ucsb.edu; danh.lephuoc@deri.org
> *Subject:* [ExternalEmail] Detailed comments on SANDA
>
> I’ve added a few comments on SANDA in WebProtege [1] – initially I 
> posted than as rdfs:comment properties on the class and property 
> definitions, but I’ve now spotted the discussion-topic capability, so 
> have moved my questions there. They related to
>
> 1.The names of the classes currently called Process, ObservedProperty, 
> FeatureOfInterest
>
> 2.The range of the property feature-of-interest
>
> 3.The definition of resultTime
>
> 4.The need for an additional time property.
>
> Several of these suggestions relate to alignment with om-lite.
>
> Simon
>
> [1] 
> http://webprotege.stanford.edu/#Edit:projectId=32a4ea9e-4d06-4f92-8188-07fcd96f81a7 
>
>
> *From:*Armin Haller [mailto:armin.haller@anu.edu.au]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 29 June 2016 9:54 AM
> *To:* Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton) <Simon.Cox@csiro.au 
> <mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au>>; public-sdw-wg@w3.org 
> <mailto:public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
> *Cc:* Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au 
> <mailto:kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>>; janowicz@ucsb.edu 
> <mailto:janowicz@ucsb.edu>; danh.lephuoc@deri.org 
> <mailto:danh.lephuoc@deri.org>
> *Subject:* Re: Proposal for SSN core
>
> Maybe directly adding comments in Webprotege and then a mail to the list?
>
> *From: *"Simon.Cox@csiro.au <mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au>" 
> <Simon.Cox@csiro.au <mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au>>
> *Date: *Wednesday, 29 June 2016 6:53 am
> *To: *Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au 
> <mailto:armin.haller@anu.edu.au>>, "public-sdw-wg@w3.org 
> <mailto:public-sdw-wg@w3.org>" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org 
> <mailto:public-sdw-wg@w3.org>>
> *Cc: *Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au 
> <mailto:kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>>, "janowicz@ucsb.edu 
> <mailto:janowicz@ucsb.edu>" <janowicz@ucsb.edu 
> <mailto:janowicz@ucsb.edu>>, "danh.lephuoc@deri.org 
> <mailto:danh.lephuoc@deri.org>" <danh.lephuoc@deri.org 
> <mailto:danh.lephuoc@deri.org>>
> *Subject: *RE: Proposal for SSN core
>
> What is the best way to make comments?
>
> Simon
>
> *From:*Armin Haller [mailto:armin.haller@anu.edu.au]
> *Sent:* Monday, 27 June 2016 5:52 PM
> *To:* SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org 
> <mailto:public-sdw-wg@w3.org>>
> *Cc:* Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au 
> <mailto:kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>>; Krzysztof Janowicz 
> <janowicz@ucsb.edu <mailto:janowicz@ucsb.edu>>; danh.lephuoc@deri.org 
> <mailto:danh.lephuoc@deri.org>
> *Subject:* Proposal for SSN core
>
> Hi,
>
> I have made and uploaded a proposal for the SSN core ontology at:
>
> http://webprotege.stanford.edu/#Edit:projectId=32a4ea9e-4d06-4f92-8188-07fcd96f81a7
>
> It is largely similar to what Krzysztof proposed on the Wiki: 
> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/SSN_core_modules
>
> I added Actuators and called the core subsequently “Sensor and 
> Actuator Core Ontology” aka “Sanda”. I also added domain and range as 
> annotation properties, please check if you agree, but as discussed 
> there should not be any domain and range restrictions in the core.
>
> Cheers,
> Armin
>


-- 
Krzysztof Janowicz

Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara
4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060

Email: jano@geog.ucsb.edu
Webpage: http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/
Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net