- From: Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>
- Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 17:24:01 +0200
- To: "Svensson, Lars" <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
- Cc: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>, "Simon.Cox@csiro.au" <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>, "Kerry.Taylor@csiro.au" <Kerry.Taylor@csiro.au>, "eparsons@google.com" <eparsons@google.com>, "janowicz@ucsb.edu" <janowicz@ucsb.edu>, "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Svensson, Lars <L.Svensson@dnb.de> wrote: > On Tuesday, May 19, 2015 10:09 AM Raphaël Troncy wrote: > >> > Thanks Kerry - that's essentially the way I see it, if by "linked >> > data representation" you are implying RDF. I would like to ask those >> > people advocating a new CRS encoding in RDF, what this would be >> > useful for? >> >> Well of course, this is a very "niche" usage, but typical use cases are >> for getting an explicit semantic description of how a CRS has been built >> so that you can, for example, query for all CRSs that use a specific >> Datum, or, more simply, ask for the EPSG identifier corresponding to the >> URI of a CRS, etc. > > Another case would be to get information about lat/long vs. long/lat. +1! Andrea
Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2015 15:24:47 UTC