Apologies for missing the telemeeting!
Co-location with ISWC seems to make a lot of sense to me.
Regards,
--
John Machin
Assistant Director
Statistical Informatics: Semantics and Ontologies | Methodology and Data
Management Division | Australian Bureau of Statistics
(P) +61 2 6252 6529 (M) +61 42 453 1001
(E) john.machin@abs.gov.au (W) www.abs.gov.au
From: <Kerry.Taylor@csiro.au>
To: <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>,
Date: 26/03/2015 12:57 PM
Subject: Next f2f meeting
Telemeeting (a) this morning discussed the proposed location of next f2f in
japan for the last week in october, with the w3c TPAC meeting. There were
several people suggested holding it collocated with the iswc in the us,
october 11-15 in pennsylvania, USA instead http://iswc2015.semanticweb.org.
Several people suggested they could make it there at iswc, but not to a
sapporo event.
I am not yet sure what happened in the parallel meeting on this question,
but there is clearly a demand for iswc collocation.
comments? Perhaps a doodle poll is called for?
Kerry
