- From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:12:25 +0200
- To: "public-sdshare@w3.org" <public-sdshare@w3.org>
* Lars Heuer > > One solution could be support for archived feeds [1]; > they guarantee that a link to a feed stays stable. If a client could > not process feed X for reason Y completely, it could safely retry to > process feed X and then process feed X - 1 .. X - n. I don't get it. If the problem is that the client must completely process feed X over again in the case of failure, how would this help? The client has still got to do X over again, right? I realize the link would be stable, but the collection feed link is (implicitly, anyway) guaranteed to have a stable URL, so you can always find the fragment feed from there again. Yes, it requires a bit of processing, but in practice it takes just a fraction of a section. --Lars M. http://www.garshol.priv.no/tmphoto/ http://www.garshol.priv.no/blog/
Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2012 16:13:02 UTC