W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > July to September 2016

[Bug 20158] Unrestricted typed dictionary

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 17:00:10 +0000
To: public-script-coord@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-20158-3890-QZAZbynmL3@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20158

--- Comment #15 from Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@gmail.com> ---
If we have numeric keys, would it make sense to support [EnforceRange]?

In order to have union keys, we'd have to use a different algorithm from
http://heycam.github.io/webidl/#es-union, in order to prefer non-string types
over strings. I can certainly do without it, but it does seem possible.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 27 September 2016 17:00:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 27 September 2016 17:00:20 UTC