Re: Exposing constructors of readonly interfaces to web authors from Boris Zbarsky on 2014-07-10 (public-script-coord@w3.org from July to September 2014)

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 12:47:39 -0400
To: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
CC: Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
Message-ID: <53BEC3AB.40603@mit.edu>

On 7/10/14, 12:42 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
> It was to avoid introducing another instance. Is there a way in IDL to
> have a constructor but not have the class available in the global object?

No, but we could certainly add such a thing.  However, why is that 
desirable?  What use is a constructor you can't get hold of without 
weird tricks?

-Boris

Received on Thursday, 10 July 2014 16:48:09 UTC