W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > January to March 2014

[Bug 25048] consider whether an IDL attribute of type Promise<T> should catch exceptions and wrap them up as a rejected Promise like they are for operations

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 02:20:37 +0000
To: public-script-coord@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-25048-3890-Zzdhx5YStH@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25048

Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bzbarsky@mit.edu

--- Comment #1 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> ---
Are there use cases for attributes of Promise type where this would make sense?
 They wouldn't be creating a new Promise each time, so it's not like the
Promise would represent a operation the attribute getter triggered....

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 14 March 2014 02:20:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:37:51 UTC