W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > January to March 2014

Re: Associating new objects with globals: how to best do it?

From: Mark S. Miller <erights@google.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:09:53 -0800
Message-ID: <CABHxS9h+9uOEDuQVUeNmNMbKBt6b2dX_c16GsxyYESB7+-6R6w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen@wirfs-brock.com>
Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, Bobby Holley <bholley@mozilla.com>
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock
<allen@wirfs-brock.com>wrote:

> On Feb 25, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Mark S. Miller wrote:
>
> > Just noting that some of the ES7 proposals (e.g., WeakRefs) will require
> all objects (e.g., that can be pointed to weakly) to be associated with a
> Realm.
>
> Why?  Are the proposal that currently say that?


http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:weak_refs#security



> Can it be avoided?
>

I don't see how, but I'm open to suggestions.



>
> Allen
>
>
>


-- 
    Cheers,
    --MarkM
Received on Tuesday, 25 February 2014 19:10:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:37:51 UTC