- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 20:41:37 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- cc: public-script-coord@w3.org
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 2/14/14 2:29 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Feb 2014, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > > > On 2/14/14 12:51 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > > > > These are black-box indistinguishable, as far as I understand. > > > > > > That .... depends. If there's a method around that takes a > > > NavigatorGeolocation parameter, that's a reasonable thing to do with > > > the "implements" approach but not the partial interface approach. > > > > Sure. I'm talking exclusively about the [NoInterfaceObject] case, > > though, > > Yes, so am I. > > I guess the "implements" case with a NavigatorGeolocation parameter > somewhere is not black-box distinguishable from the partial interface > case and a union type parameter, except for the error message the > browser will produce... In the case of Navigator*, I don't understand how the argument can be distinguisable. There's only one type of object per environment that implements Navigator*. I agree that in the generic case you can certainly make them distinguishable if you want. But you have to do that on purpose. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 14 February 2014 20:42:00 UTC