W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > January to March 2014

Re: partial interfaces, [NoInterfaceObject]

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 19:29:23 +0000 (UTC)
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
cc: public-script-coord@w3.org
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1402141928470.31525@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 2/14/14 12:51 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > These are black-box indistinguishable, as far as I understand.
> 
> That .... depends.  If there's a method around that takes a 
> NavigatorGeolocation parameter, that's a reasonable thing to do with the 
> "implements" approach but not the partial interface approach.

Sure. I'm talking exclusively about the [NoInterfaceObject] case, though, 
where you can't get hold of the interface object because it's just mushed 
into the thing that implements it, as if it was partial.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 14 February 2014 19:29:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:37:51 UTC