W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > January to March 2014

[Bug 22646] So if we want to say on a per-object basis whether it ought to be exposed to workers (which I think is useful) lets introduce "exposed to document environments", "exposed to worker environments", and [...]

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 21:35:46 +0000
To: public-script-coord@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-22646-3890-cb5N0Mweha@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22646

--- Comment #22 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> ---
For arguments, I don't think there's a problem with just exposing them
everywhere. It's black-box indistinguishable from not exposing them (unless
it's a constructor that only takes unexposed types, since then it'd be
uncallable, but I'm not aware of any such cases). It's return values I'm more
worried about.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 28 January 2014 21:35:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:37:51 UTC