W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > January to March 2014

[Bug 22646] So if we want to say on a per-object basis whether it ought to be exposed to workers (which I think is useful) lets introduce "exposed to document environments", "exposed to worker environments", and [...]

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 19:29:03 +0000
To: public-script-coord@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-22646-3890-lJ9PRml3rn@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22646

Travis Leithead [MSFT] <travil@microsoft.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |travil@microsoft.com

--- Comment #8 from Travis Leithead [MSFT] <travil@microsoft.com> ---
Do we need more fine-grained management? For example, the Web Perf WG asked
about including only _some_ APIs on their window.performance object, but not
others (e.g., performance.now() everywhere, but not necessarily the statistics
objects...)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 23 January 2014 19:29:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:37:51 UTC