- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 11:11:41 -0400
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
On 6/29/14, 10:55 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > Are you saying we cannot have a WebIDL interface (DOMRectReadOnly) > representing a "common base class" for DOMQuad.bounds rectangles and > mutable DOMRects, because there are separate implementations with > different internal state? You can, but it takes some gyrations: effectively defining some sort of virtual hooks on the parent class and implementing them in the subclasses. The main benefit would be that scripts would have a one-stop place to hook getters on all rectangles by doing that on DOMRectReadOnly.prototype, but it's not terribly clear to me how useful that is. -Boris
Received on Monday, 30 June 2014 15:12:10 UTC