- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 13:51:12 -0500
- To: Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
On 11/18/13 1:37 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote: > Fair enough. I think I just saw "two loops" and freaked out irrationally. Concern rescinded. OK. > Indeed. I didn't see performance concerns raised (even misguided ones like mine). Again, the major performance concern is using the iterator API at all. It's a huge amount of overhead compared to how sequences work right now. I can probably quantify that once I've tried implementing it (and then see whether that overhead is acceptable enough to actually make the change...). > I still think only doing one iteration would be more idiomatic, I agree. Complications start when you have two sequence arguments and the like. :( -Boris
Received on Monday, 18 November 2013 18:51:41 UTC