W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: [matrix][cssom-view] DOMPoint, DOMPointLiteral definitions

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 06:56:23 +1300
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLb_=+fRdA7Tb9DZs3BN2gYr8Qk7mTJhgQiomwwedhbXNw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:02 AM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote:

> Do we need to differentiate between live/read-only and immutable at all?
>

In theory it could be useful for some clients to know when an object is
immutable, because it means they can avoid copying it.

Currently we don't need DOMRectImmutable because AFAIK we don't have
anything that would return an immutable rect. So we can avoid specifying it
for now, and just specify DOMRect and DOMRectMutable.

Rob
-- 
Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w  *
*
Received on Monday, 30 September 2013 17:56:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:37:50 UTC